33
/
AIzaSyAYiBZKx7MnpbEhh9jyipgxe19OcubqV5w
August 1, 2025
Public Timelines
Menu
Public Timelines
FAQ
Public Timelines
FAQ
For education
For educational institutions
For teachers
For students
Cabinet
For educational institutions
For teachers
For students
Open cabinet
Create
Close
Create a timeline
Public timelines
Library
FAQ
Edit
Download
Export
Duplicate
Premium
Embed
Share
Oregon vs Smith
Category:
Other
Updated:
13 Dec 2017
0
0
563
Contributors
Created by
kaden Crawford
Attachments
Comments
Slenderman
By
kaden Crawford
9 Oct 2017
0
0
592
Oregon vs Smith
By
kaden Crawford
17 Nov 2017
0
0
426
Mendez vs LA County
By
kaden Crawford
12 Dec 2017
0
0
423
Lee vs United States
By
kaden Crawford
12 Dec 2017
0
0
393
New timeline
By
kaden Crawford
12 Dec 2017
0
0
340
Events
The Court case was argued
The court case was decided
The two counselors lost their battle in state court
the U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case to the Oregon Supreme Court for a determination whether the use of peyote by the claimants violated State law.
U.S. Supreme Court granted the Oregon Employment Division its petition for writ of certiorari on this issue
Court case was citated
the Supreme Court granted for the second time the oregon employment division's petition for writ of certiorari
The law defines controlled substances as a drug classified in schedules I through V
Schedule I contains the drug peyote a hallucinogen
Justice Antonin Scalia observed that the Court has never held that an individual's religious beliefs excuse him from compliance with an otherwise valid law prohibiting conduct that government is free to regulate.
About & Feedback
Terms
Privacy
Library
FAQ
Support 24/7
Cabinet
Get premium
Donate
The service accepts bank transfer (ACH, Wire) or cards (Visa, MasterCard, etc). Processed by Stripe.
Secured with SSL
Comments