jan 1, 1140 - Brought by Abelard (1079–1142)

Description:

It was not until Anselm, with his satisfaction theory of atonement, that a theory of atonement was specifically articulated.[5] The moral influence theory was developed, or most notably propagated, by Abelard (1079-1142),[1][2][note 1] as an alternative to Anselm's satisfaction theory.[1]

Abelard not only rejected the idea of Jesus' death as a ransom paid to the devil,[3][2] which turned the Devil into a rival god,[2] but also objected to the idea that Jesus' death was a "debt paid to God's honor."[3] He also objected to the emphasis on God's judgment, and the idea that God changed his mind after the sinner accepted Jesus' sacrificial death, which was not easily reconcilable with the idea of "the perfect, impassible God [who] does not change."[3][8] Abelard focused on changing man's perception of God as not offended, harsh, and judgmental, but as loving.[3] According to Abelard, "Jesus died as the demonstration of God's love," a demonstration which can change the hearts and minds of the sinners, turning back to God.
- WIKI

"Jesus Christ came and died in order to bring about a positive change to humanity. This moral change comes through the teachings of Jesus alongside His example and actions"
...
"In this theory, the Holy Spirit comes to help Christians produce this moral change"
...
This sees the saving work of Jesus not only in the event of the crucifixion, but also in all the words He has spoken, and the example He has set. In this theory, the cross is merely a ramification of the moral life of Jesus. He is crucified as a martyr due to the radical nature of His moral example

- https://www.sdmorrison.org/7-theories-of-the-atonement-summarized/

Added to timeline:

Date: