jan 1, 1994 - J.E.B. v. Alabama

Description:

J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994)

Overview: Equal protection clause prohibits exclusion of potential jurors solely on basis of gender.

History:
Certiorari to the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals 606 So.2d 156

Biography: On the behalf of T.B., the mother of the minor, the state of Alabama sued on their behalf. They call it T.B. to not disclose any names.

Facts:
Alabama sued J.E.B for child support. As a result, during jury selections challenges specifically targeted male jurors to try and remove them.

Issue:
Can one predominantly strike jurors based on sex during jury selection?

Rule:
Previously you were able to strike anyone based on their sex.

Analysis:
There was a trend in the court of eliminated the striking down of jurors bases on sex and race. This case was perfect to present to the Supreme Court so that they can change this.

Conclusion:
Intentional discrimination on the basis of gender by state actors in the use of peremptory strikes in jury selection violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.

Related Cases:
This case follows up on previous cases that stated that you can't exclude members in the jury because of their race. (Batson v. Kentucky) 1986

Added to timeline:

Date:

Images: