1 jun 629 ano antes da era comum - ANCHOR: Assyrian/Babylonian Synchronism

Descrição:

EXAMINATION OF ANACHRONISMS IN BIBLICAL AND ASSYRIAN CHRONOLOGIES by Gerard Gertoux

This example shows that the Assyrian King List (AKL) do not mention any co-regency because they have been suppressed. The absence of co-regencies among the Assyrian reigns is an academic dogma that is false. Consequently, the presence of co-regencies modifies the dating of some synchronisms. For example, in the AKL there is a synchronism between Year 1 of the Assyrian king Aššur-etel-ilâni (627– 626) and Year 22 of the Babylonian king Kandalanu in 626 BCE, but in the list of eponyms this synchronism occurs between Year 1 of Aššur-etel-ilâni and Year 19 of Kandalanu in 629 BCE. The 3- year co-regency between Aššur-etel-ilâni (630-626) and Aššurbanipal (669-627) were thus deleted in the AKL (presumably because Aššurbanipal had become senile?), which modifies the dating of the synchronisms during this period. The in-depth study of the reign of Aššur-etel-ilâni (Na'aman: 1991, 243- 267) revealed two essential points, the Assyrian king lists eliminated all usurpers and all co-regencies. Thus, the AKL eliminated Sin-šum-lišir (considered a usurper) and the 3-year co-regency of Aššur-etel- ilâni with Aššurbanipal.