30
/it/
AIzaSyAYiBZKx7MnpbEhh9jyipgxe19OcubqV5w
April 1, 2024
Public Timelines
FAQ
Menu
Public Timelines
FAQ
Public Timelines
FAQ
For education
For educational institutions
For teachers
For students
Open cabinet
For educational institutions
For teachers
For students
Open cabinet
Creare
Close
Create a timeline
Public timelines
Library
FAQ
Scaricare
Export
Creare una copia
Premium
Integrare nel sito Web
HNUH Benchmark
Modificare
è stato aggiornato 13 dic 2022
0
0
90
Share
Autori
Created by
Rida Khan
List of Edits
Attachments
Comments
Eventi
Discussion about what our target audience is: People who you are close with, not just random people who you have just met.
Misinformed vs conspiracy theorist: someone who can update their beliefs vs. someone who gets defensive about them, we target conspiracy theorists.
Problem to solve: Talking to someone to change their mind might be intimidating and difficult The utility and necessity of changing minds in the context of Pizzagate and political polarization
Know the Field: Reached out to Dr. Lombardi and Tremblay Boire and recieved resources
Create an outline for research: - who believes in a conspiracy theory, why? -other things you could potential do besides this skill - General outline for the conversation - Types of fallacies
Research Takeaways: Debunking Handbook: skeleton for the conversation Zoe Bee Video: Always maintain respect, reframe conspiracy theorists as curious, appeal to "common sense"
Group Contract
Benchmark 1: Skill: have a meaningful and productive conversation with conspiracy thoerist Connection with HNUH: Information weaponization, Deliberative Democracy, Audience: Could be anyone, specifically in the context of Covid and the 2020 election Support: Dr. Lombardi (Information Weaponization professor) Impact: be able to provide a step-by-step guide to starting the conversation rather than providing general tips, emphasis on action
Finding Thought Leaders: Dr. Karen Douglas: Professor of Social Psychology at the University Of Kent, specializes in conspiracy theories. Takeaways about causes of conspiratorial beliefs Megan: Primary source of someone who was a conspiracy theorist and how they left those beliefs Prof. Kate Starbird, Center for an Informed Public faculty director: advice on how to approach: assume they are misinformed rather than a conspiracy theorist, face to face conversation
Finalized outline for presentation Problem: Belief in conspiracy theories causes insurmountable conflict in relationships Cause: Epistemic, existential, social needs, preexisting beliefs, social media Action: Have a conversation with them after understanding their beliefs to debunk Demonstration: Students pair up, one acts as a conspiracy theorist and the other uses our skill to talk to them
What's Missing? Points to Improve: What to do when counterarguments are used -> directly address these fallacies Pretending to be a conspiracy theorist in the demonstration isn’t useful because it is hard to pretend -> change demonstration activity to watching a video of someone else debunk and criticize that https://youtu.be/yh2cjveut1M?t=67
What's Missing II Limitations as part of our scope: We will not address someone who (1) does not respect you or (2) is not open to communication as those are more rooted in preexisting relationship dynamics and would undermine any attempts at debunking
Peer Review w/ Andrew and Matt
Present
Submit Peer Reviews
Finalize Presentation in Person
Incorporate Feedback from Peer Review - minimize jargon, fully explain causal gap and logical fallacies -add more visuals such as graphs and flowcharts to make the presentation easier to follow and digets
Finalize "script", Practice In Person: compared presentation to example skillshare to more closely mirror the format (added clearly defined thesis statement and scope slides)
About & Feedback
Accordo
Privatezza
Biblioteca
2024
©
Time.Graphics
Support 24/7
Cabinet
Get premium
Donate
The service accepts bank transfer (ACH, Wire) or cards (Visa, MasterCard, etc). Processed by Stripe.
Secured with SSL
Excellent (Trustpilot Reviews)
Based on 115+ reviews
Write your own review on
Trustpilot.com
Comments