30
/it/
AIzaSyAYiBZKx7MnpbEhh9jyipgxe19OcubqV5w
April 1, 2024
Public Timelines
FAQ
Menu
Public Timelines
FAQ
Public Timelines
FAQ
For education
For educational institutions
For teachers
For students
Open cabinet
For educational institutions
For teachers
For students
Open cabinet
Creare
Close
Create a timeline
Public timelines
Library
FAQ
Scaricare
Export
Creare una copia
Premium
Integrare nel sito Web
Economic Geography
Modificare
è stato aggiornato 2 ott 2018
0
0
368
Share
Autori
Created by
Janelle
List of Edits
Attachments
Comments
Eventi
Marad named two committees: *Standards for container sizes *Study container construction
Marad's committee meetings: *Containers should be no more than 8.5 ft. high, but could be less. *Length was deferred.
American Standards Association: *Materials Handling Sectional Committee (MH-5) *Adoption was optional.
MH-5's proposed dimensions were accepted: *12 & 24ft *17 & 35ft *20 & 40ft Marad changed it's mind about height: *Changed to 8ft
ASA dimension subcommittee: *Revisited the question of container length *10-20-40ft lengths were approved *27ft in the West *Container construction standards ALL sent for a vote in late 1959
10-20-30-40ft boxes were declared to be the only standard containers. *Federal Maritime Board - only these could receive construction subsidies.
International Organization for Standardization *Agreed to study containers *Establish world wide guidelines *ISO Technical Co. 104 (TC104)
Europe was allowing larger vehicles.
Compromise: *Smaller containers would be recognized as "Series 2" containers.
Series 2 & 10-20-30-40ft containers were formally adopted as ISO standards.
Periodi
Marad continued developing standards after being asked by MH-5 to step away.
About & Feedback
Accordo
Privatezza
Biblioteca
2024
©
Time.Graphics
Support 24/7
Cabinet
Get premium
Donate
The service accepts bank transfer (ACH, Wire) or cards (Visa, MasterCard, etc). Processed by Stripe.
Secured with SSL
Excellent (Trustpilot Reviews)
Based on 115+ reviews
Write your own review on
Trustpilot.com
Comments