29
/es/
es
AIzaSyAYiBZKx7MnpbEhh9jyipgxe19OcubqV5w
April 1, 2024
Crear
Public Timelines
Biblioteca
FAQ
For education
Cabinet
For educational institutions
For teachers
For students/pupils
Descargar
Export
Crear una copia
Insertar en el Sitio Web
editar
Vistas 413
0
0
Oregon vs Smith
Creado
kaden Crawford
⟶ Actualizado 13 dic 2017 ⟶
List of edits
Timeline desde
kaden Crawford
:
9 oct 2017
0
0
466
Slenderman
17 nov 2017
0
0
335
Oregon vs Smith
12 dic 2017
0
0
314
Mendez vs LA County
12 dic 2017
0
0
286
Lee vs United States
12 dic 2017
0
0
266
New timeline
Comentarios
Eventos
The Court case was argued
The court case was decided
The two counselors lost their battle in state court
the U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case to the Oregon Supreme Court for a determination whether the use of peyote by the claimants violated State law.
U.S. Supreme Court granted the Oregon Employment Division its petition for writ of certiorari on this issue
Court case was citated
the Supreme Court granted for the second time the oregon employment division's petition for writ of certiorari
The law defines controlled substances as a drug classified in schedules I through V
Schedule I contains the drug peyote a hallucinogen
Justice Antonin Scalia observed that the Court has never held that an individual's religious beliefs excuse him from compliance with an otherwise valid law prohibiting conduct that government is free to regulate.