33
/es/
AIzaSyB4mHJ5NPEv-XzF7P6NDYXjlkCWaeKw5bc
November 1, 2025
9721591
490409
2
Public Timelines
FAQ Obtener premium

12 h 10 m, 22 mayo 2020 año - Depp v Heard Motion To Quash Weinstein Subpoena and Issuance Of A Protective Order DENIED

Descripción:

NY = New York City

Amber Heard had issued a Subpoena Duces Tecum to The Weinstein Company asking question about Johnny Depp during the making of The Libertine in 2004. At this time Weinstein’s first trial was taking place in the Manhattan Supreme Court and anyone associated with him was being tarred with the same brush - hence Johnny Depp also requesting a Protective Order.

It is also worthy of note that Roberta Kaplan had previously represented Harvey Weinstein in a different matter but had links with his company nevertheless.

As the subpoena was to be served to the New York based Weinstein Company the petition to quash was filed in the New York County Court.

LETTER / CORRESPONDENCE TO JUDGE (Motion #001) Letter to the Honorable Arthur F.
Engoron withdrawing Petition to Quash Non-Party Subpoena and for Issuance of a Protective
Order; Filed By: Meyers, J.; Filed: 02/27/2020; Received: 02/27/2020 LETTER

Añadido al timeline:

hace 4 horas
24
2
191426

fecha:

12 h 10 m, 22 mayo 2020 año
Ahora mismo
~ 5 years and 4 months ago

Fotos: