Prehistory (According to Textbooks) (9 fev 10000 ano antes da era comum – 1 jan 3500 ano antes da era comum)

Descrição:

Today, there are not consistent scientific evidence about a "prehistoric man," before the Hommo Sapiens. In fact, creatures labeled as Neanderthal have been reclassified as Homo sapiens. Evolutionists admit that the problem lies in the fact that since Neanderthal was supposed to be primitive, he was "reconstructed" with "primitive" features in mind. In other words, it was their reconstruction that created the image! Today, almost none of the "reconstructions" found in popular magazines and textbooks correspond to the creatures found in scientific literature.

However, this does not mean that there is no evidence of prehistoric findings, use of metals, physical changes on the planet and human remainings of regular human beings, with already extinguished animals, BEFORE a system of writing existed and the Ancient Civilizations. For example Dinosaurs bones and even flesh have been preserved up to this day in some of the most recent findings. The problem is not lack of evidence of prehistoric times, but how can this evidence be interpreted today, when scientists today can't go to the past, and observe these facts themselves?

How can we as humans today assure, based on evidence today, that the prehistoric period was a million years long or just a few thousand years old? In both cases, it becomes a matter of faith, speculation instead of science.

It is not the teacher but scientists who have studied genetics, microbiology, and other disciplines of the 21 century, that are finding great problems with the reasoning and conclusions of the theory and books of Charles Darwin, who existed in the 19 century. Therefore, isn't possible that conclusions based on this theory can also lead to wrong or incomplete conclusions about what is true in the physical world?

Today, dear students, you must avoid circular reasoning and identify the fallacies of reasoning that lead us to invalid conclusions, this is the only way to cultivate critical reasoning skills, instead of blind beliefs. If you believe something you must be able to support it with science, objectivity, and unrefutable arguments.


Therefore, history usually begins with the implementation of writing, and its civilizations, which have more consistent patterns of evidence.

Adicionado na linha do tempo:

Data: