18 maio 2004 ano - Hamdi vs. Rumsfeld and Rasul vs. Bush

Descrição:

court ruled that Hamdi had a right to a hearing. "made clear that a state of war is not a blank check for the president when it comes to he rights of the nations citizens." did not prosecute hamdi. prisoners had been held for more than 2 years in territory that the US controls. Even though the prisoners are not on US soil, they can ask US courts if their detention is legal..

Adicionado na linha do tempo:

Data: