12 h 10 min, 22 mai 2020 ans - Depp v Heard Motion To Quash Weinstein Subpoena and Issuance Of A Protective Order DENIED
Description:
NY = New York CityAmber Heard had issued a Subpoena Duces Tecum to The Weinstein Company asking question about Johnny Depp during the making of The Libertine in 2004. At this time Weinstein’s first trial was taking place in the Manhattan Supreme Court and anyone associated with him was being tarred with the same brush - hence Johnny Depp also requesting a Protective Order.
It is also worthy of note that Roberta Kaplan had previously represented Harvey Weinstein in a different matter but had links with his company nevertheless.
As the subpoena was to be served to the New York based Weinstein Company the petition to quash was filed in the New York County Court.
LETTER / CORRESPONDENCE TO JUDGE (Motion #001) Letter to the Honorable Arthur F.
Engoron withdrawing Petition to Quash Non-Party Subpoena and for Issuance of a Protective
Order; Filed By: Meyers, J.; Filed: 02/27/2020; Received: 02/27/2020 LETTER
Ajouté au bande de temps:
Date:
12 h 10 min, 22 mai 2020 ans
Maintenaint
~ Il y a 4 ans et 11 mois